Subject: CWI usage

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 93 12:55:05 EDT

Bernie,
Thanks for the clarification - I understand now.  I've looked at the implemen-
tation some and don't see the CWI bit being used, which is in line with David
Miller's comment that "CWI usage has not been defined yet".  I think we can
define it here in the way we think will work best.
Peter

---

From: "Bernard Brady" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 93 15:28:56 EDT

Peter,

I would like some clarification on one issue that I noticed that is not
in the flow control information presented so far. Is flow control based
on a per circuit basis and on the connection.  The reason I say this is
that by what I read in the RFC if two devices have multiple LLC2
sessions with one another they  would be seen as seperate circuits on
the same connection.  If I wanted to flow control I could either do this
on the entire connection between the two DLSs or on a per circuit basis. 
Is this a correct interpretation.

Thank You
Bernie